![]() ![]() I say this, because although I've experienced the issue being discussed with SourceTree before, I've never actually experienced any problems wih BitBucket itself before). (Also, AFAICT, the root of the problem is definitely SourceTree, and neither BitBucket itself nor anything else at Atlassian's side of things. Sharing this information, not to have a go at SourceTree, nor to complain, but simply because it might indicate a possible solution for others in the same situation as my own (in the sense that maybe that hadn't yet considered using Git bash to handle all their Git-related business). Would be great to be able to use SourceTree as intended, but until such a time comes, I'll just continue using Git bash (which has thus far worked perfectly for me, without any major problems) to interact with BitBucket (plus any other Git-related services and platforms). In this case, we can see that 5e2791da4 was force pushed over by 4b682452, which means 5e2791da4 is the one we need to restore to.Not really a true "solution" to the *root* of the problem being discussed, but in my case, since my previous reply to this discussion, I've long since just been going about all my Git-related business via Git bash, which has worked out perfectly for me. However, if you want to try it, GitLab lists the set of commits that are new to the branch: 6,220 2 0 Sourcetree pushPassword Required sourcetree 3. GitLab's UI isn't as clear to read as GitHub's, and so I'd recommend using the git reflog trick from above if possible. Gerrit Force Push Branch Tag Gerrit Push git push. This means that 5bc1d11 was force pushed over by 83da01d, which means 5bc1d11 is the one we need to restore. Let's take the final example: jamietanna force-pushed the chore/spotless branch from 5bc1d11 to 83da01d 2 days ago When force pushing on GitHub, the UI shows information about the force-pushes that have occurred: This tells us that the last push to the remote was 5e2791da4 and it overrode c574fceb1, so c574fceb1 is the one we need to restore to. $ git reflog refs/remotes/origin/update/wiremock-docs If we're using the branch update/wiremock-docs, on the Git remote origin, then we can use git reflog like so: If you don't have that output any more, we can fortunately use git reflog to recover this. This means that the left-hand side commit hash, c574fceb1 is the one we need to restore to. Git is telling us that it's just force pushed the branch update/wiremock-docs to commit 5e2791da4, when before it was c574fceb1. ![]() + c574fceb1.5e2791da4 update/wiremock-docs -> update/wiremock-docs (forced update) Total 5 (delta 4), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0 Let's say that the output they see is: Enumerating objects: 9, done. The first thing is to make sure that they didn't close the window, or lose the output of the command they'd just run to force push. Previous versions had this at SourceTree/Preferences/General toward the bottom of the 'General' dialog. This allows for the ability to click Force Push in the push dialog whilst pushing a commit. From the Git CLI With the output from git push -force You can force push in Sourcetree if you first enable it: Tools -> Options -> Git -> Enable Force Push 6mo Bruno Sosa where execute in sourcetree git push -force origin yourbranch 8mo Amadej. Go to SourceTree/Preferences/Advanced and click the 'Allow force push' checkbox at the top of the 'Advanced' dialog. Unfortunately, without a practical example, I can't share too much about how to do that. Note that these are from the viewpoint of your local machine being the one who's pushed it - if trying to recover someone else's, you may need to git fetch -all at some point, and play around with the commands. In the spirit of blogumentation, I thought I'd document it for future me. One of my colleagues recently got in touch with me to say that they'd force pushed to the wrong branch, and needed a hand to recover things if possible.įortunately, this is something I've had to do numerous times - because I've got it wrong myself - so I was able to help. Edit: It is now added in SourceTree, but you need to turn the option on in the settings. SourceTree is very cautious with this as the force option is by default deactivated. For SourceTree, you can follow exactly the same steps, but you have to take into account that you still need force push this. I really like telling a descriptive story with our Git commit history, and spend a fair bit of time making sure that the history provides the right level of information.īecause writing Git commit messages, and having a good commit history, leads to needing to rewrite Git history, I'm quite comfortable with git rebase and rewriting Git history safely. You can still use the same commands, but you will need to force push the commit using git push -force example-branch. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |